User Tools

Site Tools


discussion_points

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
discussion_points [2017/04/06 02:23] – johnkinndiscussion_points [2023/07/31 01:04] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
-Here will be links to points within the system notes which are new or require discussion.  After the non-poster --- Gabor if John posted, John if Gabor posted --- has read the discussion point, he will make a notation here to that effect along with a response.+Here will be links to points within the system notes which are new or require discussion.  After the non-poster --- Gábor if John posted, John if Gábor posted --- has read the discussion point, he will make a notation here to that effect along with a response.
  
-By the way, <nowiki>'\+'</nowiki> now works (it puts a superscript "+" in the document.+I agree with those. I would also add that the second relay cannot be declarer's first suit. E.g.  
 +1\S-1N / 2\H-2\S is just a non-invitational 3 card preference to \S, and at most a singleton \H. (The hand cannot be invitational, as in that case there was a 5 card minor to bid -- although this logic could be applied to the non-passed hand, too...) 
 +1\D-1N-2\C-2\D is also not second relay, it may have 4\D, did not want to bypass the 5-3 or 5-4 fit in a major. 
 + --- //[[GDrasny@gmail.com|Gábor Drasny]] 2017/06/22 20:50// 
 + 
 +Those points are exactly why I said a **new suit** is a relay. 
 + 
 +Ah, ok. Looks like I needed to have it spelled out for me...
  
-[[1club-enemy-compete#item1|Gamma question]] 
  
-[[system basis#item2|do we even believe this anymore?]] 
  
-[[twomajor#item3]]3\s response to 2\h 
discussion_points.1491445428.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/07/31 01:16 (external edit)

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki