Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- discussion_points [2017/05/17 22:39] – gabor
+++ discussion_points [2023/07/31 01:04] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Here will be links to points within the system notes which are new or require discussion.  After the non-poster --- Gabor if John posted, John if Gabor posted --- has read the discussion point, he will make a notation here to that effect along with a response.
+Here will be links to points within the system notes which are new or require discussion.  After the non-poster --- Gábor if John posted, John if Gábor posted --- has read the discussion point, he will make a notation here to that effect along with a response.
-By the way, <nowiki>'\+'</nowiki> now works (it puts a superscript "+" in the document).
+I agree with those. I would also add that the second relay cannot be declarer's first suit. E.g.
+\S-1N / 2\H-2\S is just a non-invitational 3 card preference to \S, and at most a singleton \H. (The hand cannot be invitational, as in that case there was a 5 card minor to bid -- although this logic could be applied to the non-passed hand, too...)
+\D-1N-2\C-2\D is also not second relay, it may have 4\D, did not want to bypass the 5-3 or 5-4 fit in a major.
+ --- //[[GDrasny@gmail.com|Gábor Drasny]] 2017/06/22 20:50//
-[[1club-enemy-compete#item1|Gamma question]]
+Those points are exactly why I said a **new suit** is a relay.
-D0P1 is agreed then.
+Ah, ok. Looks like I needed to have it spelled out for me...
-[[system basis#item2|do we even believe this anymore?]]
-No, not really.
-I will open any 13\+ HCP hands (unless I downgrade the hand due to quacks, or unprotected honors).
-For <13 HCP distributional hands, I add distribution points, and only when borderline, I will look at the quick tricks or loser count. I may not open a one suited hand with 12 HCP if the suit quality is bad, and 1NT does not look appealing.
-[[twomajor#item3|3 Spade response to 2 Hearts]]
-Agreed - Gabor